Product Description
Starting a new SPR is never easy, and there was the problem of where the contributors should start their accounts; since time began? five years ago? An SPR should be the first port of call for an up-to-the-minute account of trends in a specialist subject rather than a dull collection of references.
Welcome to Volume 5 of the ‘Chemical Modelling’ SPR. Naturally, I want to start
by thanking my team of Reporters for the hard work they have put into making this
the best and most comprehensive volume so far. We hope you will derive benefit and
perhaps even pleasure from our efforts.
It seems a long time since I wrote the following in my Preface to Volume 1
(1999) . . .
‘Starting a new SPR is never easy, and there was the problem of where the
contributors should start their accounts; since time began? five years ago? An SPR
should be the first port of call for an up-to-the-minute account of trends in a specialist
subject rather than a dull collection of references. My solution was to ask contributors
to include enough historical perspective to bring a non-specialist up to speed, but to
include all pertinent references through May 1999. Volume 2 will cover the literature
from June 1999 to May 2001 and so on. In subsequent Volumes, I shall ask those
Contributors dealing with the topics from Volume 1 to start from there. New topics will
be given the same generous historical perspective opportunity as Volume 1 but will have
to cover the literature to 2001 + n where n = 0, 2, 4, . . . . This process will continue
until equilibrium is reached.’
Equilibrium was reached a couple of Volumes ago and some mature topics don’t
need cover every Volume.
My final sentence for Volume 1 was
‘I am always willing to listen to convincing ideas for new topics’
as indeed I am.
What others are saying
There are no contributions yet.